|
|
Caleidocicli musicali (Musical Kaleidocycles). Simmetrie
infrante dei suoni, Milano,
Rugginenti, 2005
Review
by Carmine Emanuele Cella
in "Musica theorica Spectrum",
15/51, settembre 2006,
pp.38-39
It
is not easy to identify the various approaches to musical creation by composers
during the historical evolution of music, without the risk of superficial
cataloguing. Some of them undoubtedly wrote music simply by means of what could
be defined as instinct or maybe creativity. Some others rather filtered and
directed their creativity through a strange ‘intellectual monster’
generically named technique. On the other hand, some others often pretended to
create their music only thanks to instinct, but then used a technique
‘secretely’ (if the periphrasis can be used) .
It is true that the union creativity/technique has accompanied musical creation
practically since this discipline originated. It may be useful to mention
Kircher’s Tabula Mirifica or Ockeghem’s giddy counterpoint techniques or,
more, the amazing quadruple-counterpoint machines probably used by Bach himself
(even though there is no certainty of them). Finally, it may also be useful to
mention Ligeti’s mensural techniques for the organization of his continuously
changing chords or his complex analytical functions for the organization of
rhythm (for example in L’Escalier du diable). When a composer writes music, he/she
has to menage with a technique (in the most general sense): tonality, dodecaphony
or more complex and different serial combinatorial systems. In these cases,
technique has had the role of pre-composing system, or of a free ground where to
set /frame musical creativity. A set of rules to menage with, and probably to
break.
Thus, in all of these cases, technique has become number; a musical creation can
be ultimately thought of as a complex numerical system. For instance, an
algebraic system, where the elements to use are the whole numbers from zero to
eleven: twelve symbols able to represent the semitones of the twelve-tone scale.
Even at the half of last century several theoricians/composers tried to
formalize the structure of musical pitches by means of algebraic and set
procedures; one of the earliest was undoubtedly Milton Babbitt, who wrote, among
the others, three important articles highlighting some properties of the twelve
sounds, the so called invariances, as fundamental for the composition. Besides,
some other paramount contributions were given by (just to mention a few) Donald
Martino, Allen Forte, George Perle, Robert Morris, until David Lewin’s
transformational theories and Guerino Mazzola’s geometrical ones.
It is in the path of this rich tradition that composer and theorician Luigi
Verdi’s original text may be placed – this writer is already known to
Italian (and not only Italian) readers thanks to the by-now classical text
“Organizzazione delle altezze nello spazio temperato” (Organization of
pitches in tempered space”. In this work, Verdi conceives a complex technique
of organizing pitches based on geometrical figures built on the twelve vertexes
of an imaginary dodecagon (meant as a graphic representation of the chromatic
scale) and used to check transformation of sound-groups according to
predetermined cycles. Even though other attempts linked to cyclicity (or
periodicity) were made and described by composers as Xenakis (theory of cribles)
, Perle, Schat (tone clock) or Vieru (modal theory), Verdi’s work shows its
original approach also thanks to the use of a particular “graphism” (however
meant as a really practical instrument for computing and not as mere visual
delight) which is expressed by graphic representations, tables and colour
drawings.
In the first chapter of the book, there are the basic elements of the theory: in
fact, it shows how to represent any note-set on the dodecagon and how to
transform it according to simple or complex modules (consecutive transpositions
by different intervals) until it completes its period (that is to say when the
note-set returns to its original form). In the next two chapters Verdi proposes
the most original part of his text, by describing the musical kaleidocycles,
that is the transposing cycles to which chords – meant as note-sets – are
“applied”. Then, the kaleidocycle shows its real nature, a set of sets of
which Verdi knows all properties: possible configurations, relations between
modules and applied chords, common
notes between a chord and its transpositions (this property was also analysed by
Skrjabin in his late works).
What’s more, in the fourth chapter, meaningfully bearing the title of
“composing with kaleidocyles”, Verdi investigates into the field of
composing design (in Morris’s sense) and manages to shows the creative skill
of his own machines. In fact, there are many musical examples from the writer’s
own works (let’s not forget that first he is a composer and then a theorician)
which make the most interesting properties of kaleidocycles explicit, like for
example, those linked to the various forms of canons: inverted, double, triple,
complementary or rhythmic ones; in this view, Luigi Verdi, who has a Bolognese musical
training seems in the ideal path of Father Martini’s Bolognese old musical
school, as the latter was not only a music historian, theorician and composer,
but he was also one of the most productive canon writers in the history of
music.
The most original feature of Verdi’s work is from the point of view of the
technical/composing aspect: he does not deal with the issue from the point of
view of analysis but, courageously, from the point of view of composition. It is
a relevant effort, which is often unfortunately missing today. Finally, the book
ends with a useful catalogue of some possible kaleidocycles and with an appendix
containing various tables of the hexachord properties, presented by means of
original graphics named “chequered”. The book is also complete with three relevant critical
contributions by Renzo Cresti, Giovanni Guanti and Moreno Andreatta.
In such a complex period as today, when almost total distrust in today’s
composition and music is felt, such contributions as Verdi’s are invaluable.
His intellectual honesty when explaining his works, thus permitting to grasp
their inner procedures, is admirable and worthy of respect; his attitude will be
able to stimulate many young composers and will maybe regain confidence to the
art of music, which is important to man as air itself.
Carmine
Emanuele Cella
|
 |